MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7117302650 · doi:10.1002/alz70856_104119

Rightward White Matter Disease is Correlated to Intraplaque Hemorrhage

2025· article· en· W7117302650 on OpenAlexaffabout
Faraz Honarvar, Joshua Noronha, Adam Gibicar, Pascal N. Tyrrell, Pejman Jahbedar Maralani, Corinne E. Fischer, Sandra E. Black, Alan R. Moody, April Khademi

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalMcMaster UniversityUniversity of TorontoQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiseaseWhite matterHyperintensityVascular diseaseMagnetic resonance imagingLeukoaraiosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Cerebrovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of mortality with a strong link to cognitive impairment and dementia. White matter lesions (WML) are prevalent in CVD and are early markers of vascular compromise, particularly in relation to intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH), an indicator of carotid artery plaque instability. As vascular disease represents a possible treatment window for dementia subjects, this study explores the relationship between hemispheric WML asymmetry and IPH utilizing a large multicenter cohort to find novel biomarkers of disease. METHOD: FLAIR MRI scans of 264 subjects from the Canadian Atherosclerosis Imaging Network were categorized as IPH positive (IPH+) or IPH negative (IPH-) and WML biomarkers were automatically computed (Figure 1). Biomarkers related to WML prevalence (volume) and WML ischemia and progression (intensity) were extracted: ICV-normalized WML volume (WML-ICV), WML mean intensity (WML-Intensity), and WML intensity ratio (WML-IR). WML asymmetry was assessed via an asymmetry index measure (AIM). Linear mixed models and regression analyses were conducted, with adjustments for age, sex, scanner manufacturer, and stenosis, to evaluate associations between WML biomarkers and IPH status. RESULT: IPH+ patients exhibited significant rightward asymmetry in WML-ICV (0.0032 ± 0.002, p < 0.05), WML-Intensity (7.26 ± 5.41, p < 0.05), and WML-IR (0.0271 ± 0.0204, p < 0.05); Table 1. IPH+ subjects (left, right or bilateral) had more lesions that were brighter in the right hemisphere. This trend was most pronounced in younger male patients (<65 years), suggesting a high-risk demographic. Regression analysis revealed IPH as a significant predictor of WML asymmetry, with stronger effects observed in subjects with IPH in the right carotid artery. CONCLUSION: Previous studies suggest more injury in the right hemisphere for subjects with small vessel disease, and this work supports this finding. With rightward WML asymmetry being strongly associated with IPH, this could be reflecting a surrogate marker for overall vascular disease and its contribution to brain health and dementia. Automated WML biomarkers can be used to identify these high-risk patients and guide early interventions for subjects with vascular disease and dementia. Future work should validate these findings in larger, longitudinal datasets to enhance clinical applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases→French-language works237,207→