A New Species of Phyxelis Schoenherr (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Entiminae: Byrsopagini) from Alabama, USA, with New Synonymy of Paranametis Burke with Phyxelis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phyxelis lynskynorum Anderson, new species of Phyxelis Schoenherr, 1842 from Shelby and Tuscaloosa counties, Alabama, USA, is described and compared to known species in the genus. This is the third species of the genus for which males are known. Paranametis Burke, 1960 (type species Paranametis distincta Burke, 1960) is here considered a new junior subjective synonym of Phyxelis (type species Barynotus rigidus Say, 1832), and the following are new combinations (from Paranametis): Phyxelis burkei (Anderson, 2019), new combination, Phyxelis distinctus (Burke, 1960), new combination, and Phyxelis howdenae (Anderson, 2019), new combination. A checklist of the eight species now known in Phyxelis is included.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".