MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117306127 · doi:10.21464/sp39214

Integrative Bioethics in Canada

2024· article· fr· W7117306127 on OpenAlexaffabout
Michael George

Bibliographic record

VenueSynthesis philosophica · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicEthics in medical practice
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBioethicsCroatian

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Prvi dio ovog članka bavi se primarnim značajkama bioetike u Kanadi i Sjedinjenim Američkim Državama s nekoliko uputa na one aspekte integrativne bioetike (u prvom redu povijesne perspektive i pluriperspektivizam) koji se, čini se, spominju u časopisima i tekstovima. Opća je ocjena da integrativna bioetika kao takva ne postoji ni na koji zamjetan način u Kanadi (ili Sjedinjenim Državama). U ovome se radu opetovano pojavljuju metodološki problemi. Druga polovica rada predlaže neka temeljna metodološka polazišta i ocrtava neke mogućnosti za projekte integrativne bioetike, odnosno projekte u integrativnoj bioetici, koji bi se mogli pokrenuti s postojećim institucionalnim i komunalnim resursima.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.077
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.969
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.077
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.026
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.127
GPT teacher head0.455
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSynthesis philosophicaSame topicEthics in medical practiceFrench-language works237,207