MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7117311322 · doi:10.1002/alz70856_103663

Association of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms with Blood‐Based Biomarkers pTAU181, NFL, and GFAP in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

2025· article· en· W7117311322 on OpenAlexaffabout
Rahmah IKHLAS, Neda Rashidi‐Ranjbar, Nathan W. Churchill, Simon Graham, Tom A. Schweizer, Luis R Fornazzari, David G. Munoz, Corinne E. Fischer

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook HospitalUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiseaseAssociation (psychology)Cognitive impairmentCognitionBiomarkerCohort

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Neuropsychiatric Symptoms (NPS) in Alzheimer's Disease (AD) can exacerbate symptom burden and impair quality of life in patients. It is imperative to gain a better understanding of factors that contribute to NPS manifestation. This study explores the association between NPS scores and blood-based biomarkers implicated in AD including Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP), Neurofilament Light Chain (NFL), Amyloid Beta 40 (AB40), Amyloid Beta 42 (AB42), and Phosphorylated Tau at Threonine 181 (pTAU181). METHODS: Individuals with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease (AD) or Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) were included based on data from the Ontario Neurodegenerative Disease Research Initiative (ONDRI) database. From 126 participants, 107 had completed the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q) and provided blood samples for measurement of GFAP, NFL, AB40, AB42, and pTAU181 plasma levels. To assess the association between NPS severity scores and blood-based biomarkers, a partial Spearman correlation was conducted; adjusting for age, sex, and education level. A False Discovery Rate (FDR) threshold of 0.05 was applied to all p-values to control for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: We found significant correlations between several NPS domains and blood-based biomarkers. Apathy scores had a significant positive correlation with pTAU181 (Rs = 0.27, p = 0.04) and NFL plasma levels (Rs =0.30, p = 0.02); Anxiety scores showed a significant positive correlation with GFAP (Rs = 0.28, p = 0.03) and NFL plasma levels (Rs = 0.33, p = 0.006); Euphoria scores were positively correlated with NFL plasma levels (Rs = 0.27, p = 0.05); Appetite, Motor function, and Total NPI severity scores had a significant positive correlation with GFAP plasma levels (Rs = 0.31, p = 0.01; Rs = 0.31, p = 0.01; Rs = 0.29, p = 0.03). No significant findings were observed for AB40 and 42 with any NPS domain. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that certain blood-based biomarkers-pTAU181, NFL, and GFAP- are associated with the development of NPS in Alzheimer's Disease. These biomarkers may help shed light on underlying mechanisms and monitor NPS severity. However, further research in larger cohorts and longitudinal studies is needed to confirm these findings and explore causal relationships.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→