MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117311713 · doi:10.1016/j.cma.2025.118685

A phase-field formulation of frictional sliding contact for 3D fully Eulerian fluid-structure interactions

2025· article· en· W7117311713 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of British Columbia
KeywordsContact forceTangentContact mechanicsComputationEulerian pathSlip (aerodynamics)CoulombContact dynamicsNonlinear system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Phase-field Eulerian framework for 3D frictional contact in multiphase FSI • Overlap-based contact detection with phase-averaged slip velocity formulation • Robust enforcement of Coulomb friction in fully Eulerian simulations • Verified against Hertzian contact, sliding block, and ironing benchmarks • Demonstrated for ship–ice interaction with free-surface and contact dynamics Frictional sliding contact in hydrodynamic environments can be found in a range of engineering applications. Accurate modeling requires an integrated numerical framework capable of resolving large relative motions, multiphase interactions, and nonlinear contact responses. Building on our previously developed fully Eulerian fluid-structure formulation, we introduce a phase-field based formulation for dynamic frictional contact in three dimensions. While the structural deformations are represented through the evolution of individual left Cauchy-Green strain tensors, contact detection is achieved via the overlap of diffuse interfaces of colliding solids. Specifically, we utilize phase fraction functions to estimate the amount of overlap between the two interfaces, thereby circumventing explicit distance computations in 3D. The normal contact response is defined as a volumetric body force proportional to the overlap parameter, while the tangential response is computed using the Coulomb friction model. The direction of the friction forces are derived by projecting phase-averaged relative velocities onto the local tangent plane of colliding bodies. This proposed unified treatment enables the computation of both normal and frictional forces within a single momentum balance equation, avoiding separate velocity fields for individual solids. We present several test cases with increasing complexity to verify and demonstrate our proposed frictional contact model. Verification against the Hertzian contact problem shows excellent agreement with the analytical solution, with errors below 3 % in the traction profile. In the sliding block benchmark, the computed displacement profiles closely follow the analytical solution for point-mass systems across multiple friction coefficients. The ironing problem demonstrates stable force predictions under finite deformation, with normal and tangential forces matching kinetic friction laws. The robustness and scalability of the proposed formulation are further demonstrated through a representative ship-ice interaction scenario with free-surface and frictional sliding effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.645
Threshold uncertainty score0.708

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it