MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117313507 · doi:10.1002/alz70858_101225

A Technological Approach To Compensating for Cognitive Decline and Optimizing Healthcare Resources

2025· article· en· W7117313507 on OpenAlexaffabout
Valérie Larochelle, Quôc Dinh Nguyên, Julie Legault

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedication Adherence and Compliance
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalDouglas Mental Health University Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitive declineUsabilityHealth careCognitionResource (disambiguation)Cognitive reframing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The Idem Clock, a smart connected clock created by Eugeria Inc., enables caregivers to schedule reminders remotely and receive notifications if reminders are not confirmed. Through the MEDTEQ+ Innovative Health Showcase Program, the Montreal West Island Integrated University Health and Social Services Centre tested the clock to evaluate its value in home care, specifically its potential to reduce health and social service assistants' visits for medication administration. The project also assessed secondary impacts on daily living activities and social isolation. METHOD: Over seven months, 48 older adults with mild to moderate cognitive impairments receiving home care services participated. Inclusion criteria included a Functional Autonomy Measurement System (FAMS) memory score of 0, -0.5, or -1, and a need for medication reminders. Exclusion criteria included severe memory impairment (FAMS score -2 or -3), Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (BPSD), or high-risk medication use. Participants were evaluated by a nurse, who confirmed eligibility, obtained consent, and demonstrated the clock to users and caregivers. Installed in users' homes, the clock displayed scheduled medication reminders. During the project, the nurse was responsible for scheduling medication reminders based on the participant's treatment. Nurses monitored compliance and received notifications when reminders were not confirmed. Performance was evaluated via feedback, re-evaluations, and daily home visits. RESULTS: Participants used the clock for an average of 66 days, with 81% continuing post-trial. During the trial, 6,365 home visits were avoided, achieving a ratio of 53 visits avoided per programmed reminder. Each clock displayed an average of 68 reminders monthly (mean of 2 per day), with users confirming 80% of them. Estimated cost savings totaled CAD 80,842 for the healthcare center. CONCLUSION: The Idem Clock shows strong potential to enhance home care by reducing resource utilization and promoting self-management for older adults with cognitive impairments. These findings support broader implementation, with recommended refinements to improve usability and application across diverse care settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicMedication Adherence and ComplianceFrench-language works237,207