Governance Strategies for Execution of Public Building Projects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The execution of public building projects often faces multifaceted challenges. One of these challenges is the governance system adopted in the execution of such projects. This study seeks to assess a suitable project governance strategy for the execution of public building projects in Nigeria. The populations for the study consist of construction professionals involved in the execution of public building projects. A survey research design was adopted using census sampling techniques and the data collected were analyzed using inferential statistical tools. The study revealed that a horizontal transaction governance strategy that relates to the employment relationship and involvement of market transactions for the supply of specialist skills and services is the best governance strategy to adopt in public building project delivery. Hence, the study posited for good governance; there must be good relationship between the project sponsors and project executors. In addition, contractual governance has the greatest effect on the delivery of public building projects due to the contractual aspect with the entire lifespan and logistics of the project. Once this strategy is well incorporated into an organization’s operation, it will go a long way toward maintaining good relationships between project participants, good governance, and effective project delivery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".