MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117320355 · doi:10.1002/adfm.202527985

Bioinspired Polypeptide Dendrimer‐Modified Thin‐Film Composite Membranes for Selective Lithium‐Magnesium Separation with DFT Insights

2025· article· en· W7117320355 on OpenAlexafffund
Mehrasa Yassari, S. Fatemeh Seyedpour, Bamlak Setegne, Amir Aghaei, Behzad Ahvazi, Mostafa Dadashi Firouzjaei, Mark Elliott, Mohtada Sadrzadeh

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Functional Materials · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExtraction and Separation Processes
Canadian institutionsInnovative Targeting Solutions (Canada)National Institute for NanotechnologyAlberta Advanced EducationUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada's Oil Sands Innovation AllianceAlberta Innovates
KeywordsMembraneSelectivityDensity functional theoryIonNanofiltrationDendrimerLysineCarboxylate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Selective ion transport in nanofiltration (NF) enables sustainable lithium (Li + ) recovery. While many membranes rely on strong positive charge for Li⁺/Mg 2 ⁺ separation, we show that negatively charged membranes can also excel using a biomimetic approach. Inspired by biological ion channels that achieve cation selectivity via specific binding sites despite their negative charge, we designed a nitrogen‐rich polypeptide dendrimer (amino acid–based) bearing carboxylate coordination sites with higher affinity for Mg 2 ⁺ than Li⁺, while moderating the membrane's net negative charge. This biomimetic design enhanced Li + recovery by inhibiting Mg 2+ transport through stronger interactions, thereby allowing for preferential Li + permeation. This process occurred through a combination of electrostatic modulation and ligand‐assisted coordination. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations indicated strong oxygen‐donor coordination: lysine motifs bind hydrated Mg 2+ (E ≈ −170 kcal.mol −1 ) far more strongly than Li + (E ≈ −50.2 kcal.mol −1 ). The optimized membrane achieved Li + /Mg 2+ selectivity of 15.6 at neutral pH with 23 LMH flux, and 136 at pH 4, highlighting strong performance in acidic feeds. Long‐term tests showed ∼0.4% leaching over 10 days with stable rejection and enrichment of Li⁺ (feed Li⁺/Mg 2 ⁺ increased from 0.05 to 0.20). Antifouling tests showed a twofold lower flux‐decline ratio and higher flux‐recovery than the unmodified TFC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Functional MaterialsSame topicExtraction and Separation ProcessesFrench-language works237,207