MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7117321146 · doi:10.1002/alz70857_106729

Sex and age differences in cognitive presentation, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia prevalence in older patients with concussion – a retrospective observational study

2025· article· en· W7117321146 on OpenAlexaffabout
Davina Kavita Premraj, Yasmin Soliman, Carmela M. Tartaglia, Charles Tator, Artee Srivastava

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalOntario Brain InstituteUniversity Health NetworkDiscovery Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConcussionDementiaCognitionObservational studyPost-concussion syndromeRetrospective cohort studyCognitive impairmentPoison control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Falls and concussions are a growing concern among aging populations. Often, older adults with concussions are not properly screened for post-concussion symptoms and can be diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia. Additionally, there may be sex differences related to cognitive presentation. Ultimately, recognizing sex differences in cognitive presentation following concussion is essential for improving concussion management in older adults. METHOD: Patients aged >50 years with concussion who were seen at the Concussion Clinic at the Toronto Western Hospital with a concussion in the last three years were included in this study. All data were systematically collected using REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture). All participating patients provided informed consent for their data to be used for research purposes. The dataset includes demographic details, clinical diagnoses, and cognitive assessments, including the Toronto Cognitive Assessment (TorCA) across adults with concussions within the past three years. After grouping by sex, patients were further subdivided into three categories: Normal, Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), and Dementia based on TorCA score, MCI probability, and age. RESULT: Significantly more females (n = 50; mean age = 63.7) than males (n = 26; mean age = 60.5) presented with a concussion diagnosis within three years of the appointment date than males (n = 24) within the last three years (p <0.05). When comparing diagnoses, although not significant (p = 0.12) fewer females with concussion had mild cognitive impairment (6%) compared with males (21%) while dementia frequency was similar (females 35%; males 38%). Dementia prevalence was higher in adults aged 65+ (48.15%) compared with those aged 50-64 (28.26%), though not statistically significant (p = 0.144). The TORCA scores were not significantly different between males (256.5) and females (274.2), p-val=0.11. CONCLUSION: In older adults, there is a higher prevalence of persisting symptoms of concussion in females compared to males, similar to what is known in younger populations. As expected, dementia was more frequent in the older group. Further investigation is required to elucidate the role of concussion in patients who are diagnosed with MCI or dementia when presenting with persisting symptoms of concussion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicTraumatic Brain Injury Research→French-language works237,207→