MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7117321830 · doi:10.64898/2025.12.24.696034

Paleogenomic insight into the collapse, recovery, and management of American bison

2025· article· W7117321830 on OpenAlexaff
Joshua D. Kapp, Molly Cassatt-Johnstone, Samuel Sacco, William Seligmann, Holland C. Conwell, Sarah Ford, Cassandra Gunn, Lael D. Barlow, Amy Phillips, Kenneth P. Cannon, Lawrence C. Todd, Spencer R. Pelton, Glen MacKay, Kyle Forsythe, Mark A. Edwards, Mark Ball, David R. W. Bruinsma, Jessica Z. Metcalfe, John W. Ives, Robert J. Losey, Tatiana Nomokonova, Tomasin Playford, Chris Widga, Craig M. Lee, Karsten Heuer, Wes Olson, Paul Stothard, John Southon, Donalee Marie Deck, Christopher N. Jass, Richard E. Green, Lee Jones, Gregg Patrick Adams, Todd Shury, Gregory A. Wilson, Beth Shapiro

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic diversity and population structure
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityLakehead UniversityRoyal Alberta MuseumMcGill UniversityParks CanadaGovernment of AlbertaUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBison bisonSubspeciesContext (archaeology)WildlifeExtinction (optical mineralogy)Wildlife management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract American bison were pushed to the brink of extinction by the 20th century. This bottleneck and the fragmented nature of remnant populations pose challenges to their resilience, as does human-facilitated admixture between bison subspecies and with cattle. To contextualize current diversity, we sequenced 115 ancient and 45 modern bison genomes from across North America dating back within the last ∼20,000 years. Past bison populations were highly connected, in contrast to structured modern herds. Modern wood bison carry plains bison ancestry from 1920s translocations, while many bison lack cattle ancestry that has previously been believed to be ubiquitous. Our findings reveal the legacy of human impacts on bison in the context of modern conservation and highlight the applicability of ancient DNA for guiding wildlife restoration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicGenetic diversity and population structure→French-language works237,207→