Future Officers’ Military Management Competence Development in Higher Military Educational Institutions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article reveals the specific pedagogical conditions essential for developing the management competence of future officers during their studies at higher military educational institutions in Ukraine. The research has clarified the optimal pedagogical essence, identified the required components of management competence for future officers, and determined its criteria, levels, and indicators. The management competence of future officers has been defined as an individual, integral, relatively stable, dynamically changing characteristic of the personality of cadets, which is the result of their continuous professional and personal development, manifested in the independent and responsible solution of the tasks of ensuring optimal relations between servicemen, their associations, groups, which carry out joint activities following the commanders’ orders, service duties and norms of military routine and combat activity. The structure of the management competence of future officers reflects the unity of its critical components: value-motivational, cognitive-communicative, practical-activity, and personal-reflective. A criterion-assessment apparatus has been developed and substantiated, which allows for the clear determination of the levels (high, sufficient, satisfactory, low) of managerial competence according to axiomatic, informational, communicative, and praxeoactivity criteria, with specifically identified indicators. The authors argue that with the purpose to enhance the quality of professional training of cadets in higher military educational institutions, the necessary pedagogical conditions for the development of management competence of future officers have to be designed and theoretically substantiated, such as: enrichment of the educational process in higher military educational institutions with managerial and dialogical interaction of teachers and cadets; problematic nature of cadet training in the context of modeling military management activities; ensuring real powers and responsibilities of cadets during training practice as a unit commander (by specialty); providing pedagogical support while developing professional and management qualities of future officers. To demonstrate that the pedagogical conditions for developing the managerial competence of future officers are effective, an experimental study was conducted. Comparative data on the stages of the pedagogical experiment (declarative and formative) indicate positive dynamics regarding the defined levels of formation of all components of management competence of future officers. The reliability of the obtained results was verified by methods of mathematical statistics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".