MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117340813

Tert expression in meningiomas predicts progression-free survival independent of tert promoter mutation

2025· article· en· W7117340813 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gui Chloe, Justin Wang, Vikas Patil, Alexander Landry, Pedro Castelo‐Branco, Olivia Singh, Uri Tabori, Kenneth Aldape, Felix Behling, Jill Barnholtz-Sloan, Craig Horbinski, Ghazaleh Tabatabai, Andrew Ajisebutu, Jeff Liu, Zeel Patel, Rebeca Yakubov, Ramneet Kaloti, Yosef Ellenbogen, Christopher Wilson, Aaron Cohen‐Gadol, Marcos Tatagiba, Andrew Sloan, Eric Holland, Lola Chambless, Andrew Gao, Silky Chotai, Serge Makarenko, Stephen Yip, Farshad Nassiri, Gelareh Zadeh

Bibliographic record

VenuePortuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMeningioma and schwannoma management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSanger sequencingMeningiomaProportional hazards modelGene expressionGeneMutationSurvival analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While TERT promoter mutation (TPM) has been es¬tablished as a marker of clinically aggressive meningiomas, this alteration is rare and found in less than 5% of all cases. However, a larger subset of meningiomas may exhibit aberrant TERT expression in the absence of TPMs. This study investigated the effect of TERT gene expression on clinical outcome in meningioma patients. METHODS: Clinical and mo¬lecular data were retrospectively collected on 1241 meningiomas, split into a Toronto discovery cohort and a multi-institutional validation co¬hort. Sanger sequencing and bulk RNA sequencing were used to determine TPM status and TERT gene expression. The effect of TERT expression on progression-free survival (PFS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: While meningiomas with TPM showed expectedly higher TERT gene expression compared to wildtype (TP-WT) cases (p<0.0001), TERT expression was still detected in 28.7% (157/547) of TP-WT meningiomas. Meningiomas with TERT expression showed sig¬nificantly worse PFS compared to meningiomas without any TERT expres¬sion. In fact, WHO grade 1 meningiomas with TERT expression had PFS outcomes resembling WHO grade 2 meningiomas lacking TERT expression (p=0.59). In turn, WHO grade 2 meningiomas with TERT expression had clinical outcomes similar to WHO grade 3 meningiomas without TERT ex¬pression (p=0.42). Furthermore, the proportion of meningiomas expressing TERT as well as overall TERT expression levels increased with increasing WHO grade. Multivariable analysis showed that TERT expression was sig-nificantly associated with worse PFS even when controlling for other known predictors of clinical outcome including TPM, CDKN2A/B loss, 1p/22q status and WHO grade (HR 1.85 [95% CI 1.33-2.57], p=0.00024). CON¬CLUSION: TERT expression is a novel independent biomarker of outcome for meningiomas identifiable in up to one-third of cases that may be utilized to reclassify tumors to a higher WHO grade.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePortuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)Same topicMeningioma and schwannoma managementFrench-language works237,207