Observations on Rodent Feeding Damage to PearGermplasm in Cold Storage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fall-dug nursery trees stored in a cold storage were damaged by rodent feeding over the winter of 2004-2005. Damage to pear ( Pyrus communisL.) scion cultivars was confined to the lower trunk region with little damage to the Bartlett seedling rootstocks. Damage ranged from nibbling of some buds to complete girdling and bark removal of a considerable length of the trunk. Position of the tree bundle in the storage appeared to have no effect on severity of damage. An arbitrary 7-point scale was used to rate the severity of damage on 22 cultivars. The least damaged cultivars were ‘Moonglow’, ‘Giffard’ and ‘Butirra Precoce Morettini’, whilst ‘Thornless Seckel’, ‘Conference’ and ‘AC Harrow Gold’ were severely damaged. In late spring 2005, all trees were replanted into nursery rows to allow trees to recover. Only trees with damage ratings in the slight to moderate range showed signs of recovery during the 2005 growing season.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".