MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117361656 · doi:10.15826/qr.2025.4.1036

Entrepreneurship and the Law in the 18th-Century Urals: The Criminal and Mining Activities of Fyodor Molodoy

2025· article· ru· W7117361656 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueQuaestio Rossica · 2025
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSoviet and Russian History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoriographyReignQuarter (Canadian coin)State (computer science)LegislatureFactory (object-oriented programming)EntrepreneurshipWork (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents a reconstruction of the life and work of Fyodor Molodoy, a geological prospector and one of the industrialists active in Kungur Uyezd in the early eighteenth century. Despite the considerable historiography dedicated to the economic history of Russia and the reforms of Peter the Great, issues related to the rapid development of the metallurgical industry remain understudied. The fates of petty entrepreneurs who participated in strengthening the country’s production capacity have not been adequately addressed. The aim of this article is to determine how Molodoy’s criminal past influenced his activities and whether he was able to participate in the productive life of society during the intensive economic transformations in Russia in the first quarter of the eighteenth century. The study draws on legislative acts from the second half of the seventeenth to the first quarter of the eighteenth centuries and documentary materials created primarily during the reign of Peter the Great and stored in the collections of the State Archive of Sverdlovsk Region (GASO) and the Russian State Archive of Ancient Acts (RGADA). The methodological basis of the study is formed by approaches and methods of social history. Furthermore, the use of primary source study methods played a significant role in working with historical sources. Following the analysis of the data acquired, the authors conclude that the factory owner had been convicted prior to his arrival in Kungur but escaped from exile. He managed to legalise his status and obtained the right to engage in mining operations. By the standards of the time, Molodoy was a highly skilled and versatile craftsman. The Mazuevsky Factory, which produced small iron goods for the market, became the basis for his manufacturing activities. The latter included the search for ores and minerals, as well as trade and smuggling of various goods, all of which were conducted under the guise of a permit. The capital accumulated in trade was invested in industrial production. An analysis of court and investigative documents from the 1707 case of illegal transportation of protected goods reveal a selective approach to sentencing. Molodoy received a relatively lenient sentence, but his subsequent activities once again became the focus of investigation. A rare combination of entrepreneurial spirit, unique mining skills, and repeated violations of the law shaped the fate of the factory owner. He was a unique specialist with a criminal reputation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.531
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it