MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117361656 · doi:10.15826/qr.2025.4.1036

Entrepreneurship and the Law in the 18th-Century Urals: The Criminal and Mining Activities of Fyodor Molodoy

2025· article· ru· W7117361656 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elena Borodina, Evgenii A. Kurlaev

Bibliographic record

VenueQuaestio Rossica · 2025
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSoviet and Russian History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoriographyReignQuarter (Canadian coin)State (computer science)LegislatureFactory (object-oriented programming)EntrepreneurshipWork (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents a reconstruction of the life and work of Fyodor Molodoy, a geological prospector and one of the industrialists active in Kungur Uyezd in the early eighteenth century. Despite the considerable historiography dedicated to the economic history of Russia and the reforms of Peter the Great, issues related to the rapid development of the metallurgical industry remain understudied. The fates of petty entrepreneurs who participated in strengthening the country’s production capacity have not been adequately addressed. The aim of this article is to determine how Molodoy’s criminal past influenced his activities and whether he was able to participate in the productive life of society during the intensive economic transformations in Russia in the first quarter of the eighteenth century. The study draws on legislative acts from the second half of the seventeenth to the first quarter of the eighteenth centuries and documentary materials created primarily during the reign of Peter the Great and stored in the collections of the State Archive of Sverdlovsk Region (GASO) and the Russian State Archive of Ancient Acts (RGADA). The methodological basis of the study is formed by approaches and methods of social history. Furthermore, the use of primary source study methods played a significant role in working with historical sources. Following the analysis of the data acquired, the authors conclude that the factory owner had been convicted prior to his arrival in Kungur but escaped from exile. He managed to legalise his status and obtained the right to engage in mining operations. By the standards of the time, Molodoy was a highly skilled and versatile craftsman. The Mazuevsky Factory, which produced small iron goods for the market, became the basis for his manufacturing activities. The latter included the search for ores and minerals, as well as trade and smuggling of various goods, all of which were conducted under the guise of a permit. The capital accumulated in trade was invested in industrial production. An analysis of court and investigative documents from the 1707 case of illegal transportation of protected goods reveal a selective approach to sentencing. Molodoy received a relatively lenient sentence, but his subsequent activities once again became the focus of investigation. A rare combination of entrepreneurial spirit, unique mining skills, and repeated violations of the law shaped the fate of the factory owner. He was a unique specialist with a criminal reputation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuaestio RossicaSame topicSoviet and Russian HistoryFrench-language works237,207