MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117362574 · doi:10.1093/publius/pjaf081

Co-Determination: A Central Feature of Multinational Federalism

2025· article· en· W7117362574 on OpenAlexaff
Xavier Boileau

Bibliographic record

VenuePublius The Journal of Federalism · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Systems and Governance
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultinational corporationFederalismNormativeAppealFeature (linguistics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Multinational federalism is often described as a solution to the problem of nationalities because it allows several national projects to coexist in a single state. However, while the question of self-determination within multinational federations has been developed at length, the question of shared rule remains less so. The proponents of the multinational project rarely spell out the implications of this concept. What does shared rule mean from a multinational perspective? Far more than self-determination, shared rule accounts for the normative appeal of multinational federalism. Drawing on recent advances in the study of federalism, this article argues that, to retain its normative appeal, multinational federalism must adopt a particular understanding of shared rule: co-determination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.771
Threshold uncertainty score0.459

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePublius The Journal of FederalismSame topicPolitical Systems and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207