MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117364108 · doi:10.1016/j.ekir.2025.103741

Impact of CKD on Life Participation in Latin America

2025· article· en· W7117364108 on OpenAlexaff
Andrea Matus González, Anastasia Hughes, Soledad Molina, Macarena Arancibia, Alejandro Martínez Sepúlveda, Ana Malvar, Alejandro Ferreiro, Haydee Mellado, Eduardo Lorca, Hernán Trimarchi, Rolando Claure-Del Granado, Chandana Guha, Lilia Cervantes, Adeera Levin, Claudio Mascheroni, Linda Weng, Germaine Wong, Laura Solá, Mauro Lampo, Matías Monkowski, Andrea K. Viecelli, Brooke M. Huuskes, Karine Manera, Javier Recabarren Silva, Armando Teixeira-Pinto, Jonathan C. Craig, Allison Jaure

Bibliographic record

VenueKidney International Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Health and Medical Research CouncilAgencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo
KeywordsLonelinessLatin AmericansCommunity participationVocational educationMEDLINEPublic participation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) carry symptom and treatment burden, which together with comorbidities, can impair their ability to engage in life activities. Different values and priorities regarding life participation may vary depending on the population and setting. We aimed to describe the perspectives of life participation in patients with CKD not requiring kidney replacement therapy (KRT) in Latin America. Methods: In April 2024, we conducted a workshop with facilitated breakout groups (small group discussions) involving patients, caregivers, and health care professionals in Spanish language to discuss the impact of CKD on life participation in patients with CKD. Transcripts were analyzed thematically. Results: Sixty-six participants, including 51 patients and caregivers, and 15 health care professionals from 5 countries (Argentina, Chile, Uruguay, Bolivia, and Peru) attended. Five themes were identified as follows: despair and sense of doom (coming to a sudden halt, diminished involvement in social activities with family and friends, paralyzing fear, fragility and vulnerability, and losing mental fortitude); stigmatized and judged (alone in the diagnosis, reprimanded for dietary choices, and discriminated by employers and colleagues); debilitating symptoms (incapacitated by pain and fatigue impairing functioning); threatening life goals (obscuring decision-making around family planning and relinquishing career aspirations); and garnering hope and strengthening resilience (overcoming challenges with family support, finding strength in spirituality, encouraged by clinicians, and physical activity to promote well-being). Conclusion: Patients with CKD experienced despair, hopelessness, loneliness and isolation, debilitating symptoms, and uncertainty about their family and vocational goals, which contributed to impaired life participation. Strategies are needed to address these challenges to enhance the capacity of patients to live well with CKD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKidney International ReportsSame topicDialysis and Renal Disease ManagementFrench-language works237,207