Włoskie Risorgimento w polskiej historiografii od drugiej połowy XIX do przełomu XX/XXI wieku. Przegląd literatury przedmiotu .......... 47
Bibliographic record
Abstract
THE ITALIAN RISORGIMENTO IN POLISH HISTORIOGRAPHY FROM THE SECOND HALF OF THE 19TH CENTURY TO THE TURN OF THE 21ST CENTURY: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ON THE SUBJECTIn Polish historiography, research has focused on Garibaldi and Mazzini, the Spring of Nations (1848) and Colonel Francesco Nullo, who died in the January Uprising (1863). Kalikst Morawski referred to the joint struggle for freedom and independence of both countries, while Marceli Handelsman made a detailed presentation of the ‘Italian policy’ of Prince Jerzy Adam Czartoryski. Research on Mazzini’s thought and activities was conducted by Stefan Kieniewicz in the post-WWII period and by Joanna Ugniewska in the 1970s and 1980s. A summary of the views of 20th-century Polish historians on the history of the Italian Risorgimento can be found in History of Italy by Józef Andrzej Gierowski, who emphasized that Italian unification – not devoid of difficulties and crises – gave rise to the process of shaping the modern Italian nation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".