MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117453359 · doi:10.3390/s26010184

Intelligent Identification of Micro-NPR Bolt Shear Deformation Based on Modular Convolutional Neural Network

2025· article· en· W7117453359 on OpenAlexaff
Guang Han, Chen Shang, Zhigang Tao, X. W. Yang, Bowen Du, Liang Geng

Bibliographic record

VenueSensors · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Health Monitoring Techniques
Canadian institutionsGeomechanica (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnchoringModular designConvolutional neural networkRock boltShear (geology)Artificial neural networkDeformation (meteorology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As an important means of reinforcement and support, the bolt can effectively resolve the problem of slope instability. Micro-Negative Poisson Ratio (Micro-NPR) bolts are superior to conventional bolts in mitigating large deformations caused by geological shifts. A large number of bolt anchoring systems require non-destructive testing technology for quality inspection. This technology utilizes time-domain signal characteristics to detect internal defects in the bolt anchoring systems of support engineering. The combination of stress wave nondestructive detection technology and modular convolutional neural network method can identify the shear deformation in the case of the anchor slope support. Integrating the identification results of both the shear angle and shear location sub-modules improves the accuracy of detecting shear deformation in micro-NPR bolt anchoring system, which will be of great assistance in our future engineering applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensorsSame topicStructural Health Monitoring TechniquesFrench-language works237,207