MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117454415 · doi:10.1177/19427786251392850

Contemporary anti-racist struggle and Lenin’s thought: The enduring bond between racism and imperialism

2025· article· en· W7117454415 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Geography · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Economy and Marxism
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRacismIdeologyPower (physics)Marxist philosophyReading (process)Race (biology)Anti-racism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This commentary is in response to Joe Pateman's article on Lenin, Imperialism, and Racial Liberation, presented in a Marxist reading group at York University in 2024, wherein the discussion centred on the insights provided by Lenin on imperialist racism. Our combined commentary on Pateman's work calls on left movements to challenge the ideological superstructures that reproduce (and legitimate) imperialist power, confront the imperialist root of racist realities within left strategy, and utilize the theoretical tools provided to us by Lenin in our contemporary struggles – updating them for our contextual realities which differ from Lenin's time, despite the enduring power of Lenin's work. As such, we agree with Pateman's analysis that Lenin is still relevant to anti-racist struggles today and that the struggle against racism is necessarily the struggle against imperialism, and vice versa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.661
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it