MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117456152 · doi:10.1109/tcns.2025.3649116

Adaptive NN-Based Event-Triggered Consensus for Linear Multiagent Systems With Uncertainties

2025· article· W7117456152 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Anhui ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemAdaptive controlArtificial neural networkScheme (mathematics)Boundary (topology)Adaptive systemFunction (biology)Linear system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper explores the leader-following consensus of linear multi-agent systems with matched uncertainties under undirected graph. Firstly, we employ a neural network (NN) to approximate the nonlinear uncertainties. Then, an adaptive NN-based event-triggered (ET) feedback control scheme is designed. This scheme mitigates the chattering effect resulting from high-frequency switching by incorporating an adaptive boundary layer method. Notably, the proposed dynamic triggering function relies only on agents' local state, without continuous communication with neighboring agents. It is theoretically shown that consensus error is ultimately uniformly bounded. Additionally, Zeno behavior is also shown to be excluded. Finally, two numerical examples are presented to confirm the theoretical results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it