MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117458135 · doi:10.3389/aot.2025.1707828

Near infrared spectroscopy assessment of wrist-based vascular occlusion protocols

2025· article· en· W7117458135 on OpenAlexaff
Vanja Dvekar, Faraz Sadrzadeh-Afsharazar, Leah DeVos, Gennadi Saiko, Alexandre Douplik

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Optical Technologies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular and exercise physiology
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOcclusionReactive hyperemiaThenar eminenceOxygenationVascular occlusionNear-infrared spectroscopyWristPerfusion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Vascular occlusion tests (VOTs) are widely used to assess microvascular function with near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), but protocols vary substantially, particularly in occlusion pressure and anatomical site. Most studies focus on the upper arm or thigh, with few studying distal limbs such as the wrist, highlighting the importance of standardizing wrist-based arterial occlusion pressures. Methods To address this gap, the present study examined the effects of two fixed occlusion pressures, 150 mmHg and 200 mmHg, applied at the wrist on the local muscle oxygenation dynamics. A total of 21 healthy participants underwent an 8-min experimental protocol comprising a 1-min baseline (no pressure), 3-min occlusion, and 4-min reperfusion period. Muscle oxygenation was continuously monitored from the thenar eminence of the occluded hand using a commercial near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) device (Moxy, Hutchinson, USA). Results Reactive hyperemia responses at the two pressures were compared for five distinct metrics: amplitude of muscle oxygen saturation ( S m O 2 ) ( p = 0.0065 ) , time to maximum S m O 2 ( p = 0.235 ) , and three first-derivative features: time to peak slope ( p = 0.694 ) , peak slope value ( p = 0.019 ) , and full width at half maximum (FWHM) ( p = 0.46 ) . Statistically significant differences were observed in amplitude of S m O 2 , and peak slope value. However, the temporal metrics such as time to max S m O 2 , time at peak slope value, and FWHM, were not significantly different. Conclusion Overall, this study supports the potential of wrist-based AOP protocols and highlights the importance of selecting appropriate occlusion pressures and anatomical sites to optimize vascular response while minimizing patient discomfort. Given the wrist’s anatomical advantages, incorporating wrist-based occlusion into daily practice and clinical assessments may enhance its translational potential as a pressure occlusion site.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Optical TechnologiesSame topicCardiovascular and exercise physiologyFrench-language works237,207