MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117462108 · doi:10.61784/adsj3031

FEDERATED LEARNING-AWARE MULTI-OBJECTIVE SCHEDULING FOR DISTRIBUTED EDGE-CLOUD ENVIRONMENTS

2025· article· W7117462108 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueAI and Data Science Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScheduling (production processes)Range (aeronautics)InteroperabilityOpen source

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The proliferation of Internet of Things applications and latency-sensitive computing tasks has necessitated novel approaches to resource management across distributed edge-cloud architectures. Federated Learning has emerged as a compelling paradigm for collaborative model training without centralizing data, yet integrating Federated Learning into multi-objective scheduling frameworks presents significant challenges. This paper proposes a comprehensive scheduling strategy that accounts for Federated Learning-specific requirements including model convergence time, communication overhead, and data heterogeneity while optimizing multiple conflicting objectives such as makespan, energy consumption, and resource utilization. We develop a hierarchical scheduling architecture that coordinates tasks between mobile edge computing servers, base stations, and cloud data centers while maintaining Federated Learning protocol integrity. The proposed approach employs an adaptive multi-objective optimization algorithm with dynamic crossover and mutation probabilities that adjusts resource allocation based on Federated Learning training progress and system state. Experimental evaluation demonstrates that our Federated Learning-aware scheduling strategy with adaptive genetic algorithm parameters achieves superior performance compared to fixed-parameter approaches, reducing total system cost by approximately 28 percent while improving convergence speed by 35 percent. The framework effectively balances computation offloading decisions with Federated Learning communication patterns across the hierarchical mobile edge computing infrastructure, resulting in enhanced system efficiency for distributed edge-cloud environments. This work establishes foundations for integrating Federated Learning workflows into production-scale distributed computing infrastructures while addressing the unique challenges posed by privacy-preserving machine learning paradigms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAI and Data Science JournalSame topicIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningFrench-language works237,207