MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117462964 · doi:10.1190/geo-2025-0053

Constructing piecewise-constant conductivity models for 3D magnetotelluric inversions

2025· article· en· W7117462964 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mitra Kangazian, Colin G. Farquharson

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetotelluricsInversion (geology)Cluster analysisA priori and a posterioriFuzzy clusteringFuzzy logicOrientation (vector space)Tetrahedron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The models constructed using the minimum-structure, or Occam’s, style of inversion are smeared-out and fuzzy. These blurred models may be sufficient and appropriate in the early stages of an exploration project and in regions where the subsurface structure is smooth; however, they do not give a realistic representation of thin structures or localized ore bodies that are essentially uniform geologic units separated by sharp interfaces from their surrounding host rocks. To construct piecewise-constant models with sharp interfaces, ℓ1 measure, ℓ0 measure, and fuzzy c-mean (FCM) clustering approaches were implemented and compared for the 3D magnetotelluric (MT) inverse problem using unstructured tetrahedral meshes. These methods were applied to 3D synthetic MT data and real audio-magnetotelluric (AMT) data collected in an exploration project over the McArthur River uranium mine in the Athabasca Basin, Canada, to demonstrate the effectiveness of the approaches. For the real example, geologic orientation information of the structure was also incorporated into the inversion framework. The examples showed that these approaches, in particular the clustering approach, can construct piecewise-constant models with sharp interfaces and clear boundaries between anomalous targets and their surrounding host rocks. The examples also demonstrated that the clustering approach introduced more nonlinearity into an objective function than non-ℓ2 measures, and this approach was more sensitive to the user-provided a priori information for an inversion than non-ℓ2 measures. Including geologic orientation information in the inversion framework improved the quality of the constructed models and allowed AMT data to be inverted in the coordinate system in which they were measured; there was no need to rotate the data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score0.647

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysicsSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207