Real-Time Radar-Based Hand Motion Recognition on FPGA Using a Hybrid Deep Learning Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Radar-based hand motion recognition (HMR) presents several challenges, including sensor interference, clutter, and the limitations of small datasets, which collectively hinder the performance and real-time deployment of deep learning (DL) models. To address these issues, this paper introduces a novel real-time HMR framework that integrates advanced signal pre-processing, a hybrid convolutional neural network-support vector machine (CNN-SVM) architecture, and efficient hardware deployment. The pre-processing pipeline applies filtration, squared absolute value computation, and normalization to enhance radar data quality. To improve the robustness of DL models against noise and clutter, time-series radar signals are transformed into binarized images, providing a compact and discriminative representation for learning. A hybrid CNN-SVM model is then utilized for hand motion classification. The proposed model achieves a high classification accuracy of 98.91%, validating the quality of the extracted features and the efficiency of the proposed design. Additionally, it reduces the number of model parameters by approximately 66% relative to the most accurate recurrent baseline (CNN-GRU-SVM) and by up to 86% relative to CNN-BiLSTM-SVM, while achieving the highest SVM test accuracy of 92.79% across all CNN-RNN variants that use the same binarized radar images. For deployment, the model is quantized and implemented on two System-on-Chip (SoC) FPGA platforms-the Xilinx Zynq ZCU102 Evaluation Kit and the Xilinx Kria KR260 Robotics Starter Kit-using the Vitis AI toolchain. The system achieves end-to-end accuracies of 96.13% (ZCU102) and 95.42% (KR260). On the ZCU102, the system achieved a 70% reduction in execution time and a 74% improvement in throughput compared to the PC-based implementation. On the KR260, it achieved a 52% reduction in execution time and a 10% improvement in throughput relative to the same PC baseline. Both implementations exhibited minimal accuracy degradation relative to a PC-based setup-approximately 1% on ZCU102 and 2% on KR260. These results confirm the framework's suitability for real-time, accurate, and resource-efficient radar-based hand motion recognition across diverse embedded environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".