MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117465268 · doi:10.3390/s26010172

Real-Time Radar-Based Hand Motion Recognition on FPGA Using a Hybrid Deep Learning Model

2025· article· en· W7117465268 on OpenAlexaff
Taher S. Ahmed, Ahmed F. Mahmoud, Magdy Elbahnasawy, Peter F. Driessen, Ahmed Youssef

Bibliographic record

VenueSensors · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHand Gesture Recognition Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)Field-programmable gate arrayDeep learningConvolutional neural networkNormalization (sociology)Pipeline (software)Support vector machineDiscriminative model

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Radar-based hand motion recognition (HMR) presents several challenges, including sensor interference, clutter, and the limitations of small datasets, which collectively hinder the performance and real-time deployment of deep learning (DL) models. To address these issues, this paper introduces a novel real-time HMR framework that integrates advanced signal pre-processing, a hybrid convolutional neural network-support vector machine (CNN-SVM) architecture, and efficient hardware deployment. The pre-processing pipeline applies filtration, squared absolute value computation, and normalization to enhance radar data quality. To improve the robustness of DL models against noise and clutter, time-series radar signals are transformed into binarized images, providing a compact and discriminative representation for learning. A hybrid CNN-SVM model is then utilized for hand motion classification. The proposed model achieves a high classification accuracy of 98.91%, validating the quality of the extracted features and the efficiency of the proposed design. Additionally, it reduces the number of model parameters by approximately 66% relative to the most accurate recurrent baseline (CNN-GRU-SVM) and by up to 86% relative to CNN-BiLSTM-SVM, while achieving the highest SVM test accuracy of 92.79% across all CNN-RNN variants that use the same binarized radar images. For deployment, the model is quantized and implemented on two System-on-Chip (SoC) FPGA platforms-the Xilinx Zynq ZCU102 Evaluation Kit and the Xilinx Kria KR260 Robotics Starter Kit-using the Vitis AI toolchain. The system achieves end-to-end accuracies of 96.13% (ZCU102) and 95.42% (KR260). On the ZCU102, the system achieved a 70% reduction in execution time and a 74% improvement in throughput compared to the PC-based implementation. On the KR260, it achieved a 52% reduction in execution time and a 10% improvement in throughput relative to the same PC baseline. Both implementations exhibited minimal accuracy degradation relative to a PC-based setup-approximately 1% on ZCU102 and 2% on KR260. These results confirm the framework's suitability for real-time, accurate, and resource-efficient radar-based hand motion recognition across diverse embedded environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.544
Threshold uncertainty score0.747

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensorsSame topicHand Gesture Recognition SystemsFrench-language works237,207