Écrire le féminin aujourd'hui : poétiques de l'engagement et héritages en tension chez Habiballah, O'Reilly, Riendeau et Rault-Balet
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quatre poétesses francophones — Soukaina Habiballah (Maroc), Emmanuelle Riendeau (Québec), Amber O’Reilly (Manitoba) et Suzanne Rault-Balet (France) — explorent le féminin depuis des marges souvent ignorées. Leurs voix, ancrées dans des corps marqués et des paysages contrastés, se confrontent aux héritages coloniaux et patriarcaux. Cet article interroge ce que révèle leur mise en dialogue : comment ces écritures transforment la vulnérabilité en force et déplacent la francophonie hors de ses centres traditionnels. En croisant analyses poétiques et cadres postcoloniaux et transculturels (Moura, Benessaieh, Mbembe), l’étude suit trois mouvements (corps, paysage, engagement) pour éclairer des tensions communes : la mémoire inscrite dans la chair, la géographie comme archive et la poésie comme geste critique. Il en ressort l’image d’une francophonie en archipel, faite de circulations et d’hybridités, où l’intime devient politique et l’exil, parfois, une appartenance nouvelle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.029 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".