High-Rate Bioelectrochemical Anaerobic Digester for Biomethane Production from Food Waste
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigated methane (CH4) production in a bioelectrochemically enhanced anaerobic digester (BEAD) equipped with a pair of 3-dimensional flow-through electrodes made of conductive polypropylene biorings. The performance of the BEAD reactor was compared to that of a similarly sized Anaerobic Upflow Sludge Bed (UASB) reactor. The reactors were operated at a temperature of 22 ± 1 °C using food waste (FW) leachate fed at organic loading rates of 3–8 g (LR d)−1 or at a temperature of 35 ± 1 °C using the liquid fraction of FW separated using a screw press. With both tested feedstocks, the BEAD reactor demonstrated up to 30% higher CH4 yield, reaching 0.35–0.38 L g−1 (COD consumed), compared to the UASB reactor. Additionally, reactor stability under organic overload conditions improved, with the difference more pronounced at organic loads above 6 g (LR d)−1. Energy consumption for bioelectrochemical CH4 production was estimated at 5.1–12.4 Wh L−1 (of CH4 produced), which is significantly below the energy consumption for electrochemical H2-based methanation. Overall, BEAD increases methane production and improves process stability, offering a novel sustainable solution for waste management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".