MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117471539 · doi:10.1109/ton.2025.3649391

Nested Quasi-Newton Optimization for Federated Learning Under Periodic Deterministic Communication Constraints

2025· article· W7117471539 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Networking · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCompute Canada
KeywordsLeverage (statistics)Robustness (evolution)Federated learningConvergence (economics)Benchmark (surveying)Global optimizationOptimization problemPremature convergence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Federated Learning (FL) enables decentralized model training while preserving data privacy, however, real-world deployments are often constrained by Periodic Deterministic Communication (PDC) schedules, where communication between clients and the central server occurs at fixed intervals due to bandwidth limitations, energy constraints, or regulatory restrictions. These rigid schedules introduce fundamental challenges, including delayed model updates, model drift, inefficient convergence, and heightened sensitivity to non-IID data distributions, which undermine FL performance in practical settings. To address these limitations, we propose Federated Nested Quasi-Newton Optimization (FedNQN), a novel framework that accelerates convergence and enhances FL robustness under PDC constraints. FedNQN integrates curvature-aware central acceleration with variance-controlled local adaptation, ensuring stable learning dynamics despite restricted communication. At the global level, second-order curvature information accelerates model updates, compensating for infrequent synchronization, while local updates leverage variance-controlled optimizations to mitigate drift and adapt to heterogeneous data distributions. This coordinated optimization strategy enhances convergence speed, improves model accuracy, and maintains computational efficiency, making FL more adaptable to real-world constraints. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets validate FedNQN’s effectiveness, demonstrating superior performance over state-of-the-art FL methods in terms of stability, scalability, and resilience to communication inefficiencies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.871
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0090.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it