The Applications of Machine Learning to Prognostic Modeling for Human Immunodeficiency Virus: A Protocol for a Scoping Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background and Aims: As of late 2023, an estimated 39.9 million people are living with HIV, placing strain on healthcare systems. Machine learning (ML), a branch of artificial intelligence, enables systems to improve performance through data-driven learning without explicit programming. HIV prognosis is influenced by clinical, epidemiological, and psychosocial factors, and ML algorithms have the potential to integrate these determinants efficiently. This can provide valuable insights into disease progression and risk assessment in terms of viral load, CD4 cell count, treatment initiation, treatment adherence, hospitalization, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome diagnosis, quality of life and mental health. This protocol outlines the existing applications of ML to prognostic modeling in the context of HIV, highlighting how ML can equip physicians with rapid and accurate predictions of disease progression, thereby informing treatment decisions such as clinical prescriptions and social support plans, and optimizing patient outcomes. Methods: framework. A search strategy has been developed for Medline (PubMed) and will be adapted for searches in Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library. The study selection and data extraction will be conducted in duplicate. The methods for the scoping review are prespecified to ensure transparency. Discussion: The proposed scoping review will identify effective model types, data inputs, and applications of ML in the context of HIV prognosis. While ML has been integrated into various aspects of HIV research, few studies have focused on predicting prognosis. This review aims to synthesize current uses of ML in prognostic modeling and highlight gaps within the existing technology. The findings from this review will support the development of future ML models that can inform clinical decision-making, and, in turn, optimize patient care, improve resource allocation, and enhance public health responses to the ongoing HIV epidemic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".