MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117474776 · doi:10.1109/tte.2025.3649003

Enhanced Sector Selection Method in FCS-MPC for Dual Three-Phase High-Saliency PMSMs

2025· article· W7117474776 on OpenAlexaff
Pedro F. C. Gonçalves, Subarni Pradhan, Fengyang Sun, Babak Nahid‐Mobarakeh

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)HarmonicsControl theory (sociology)Subspace topologyDual (grammatical number)Controller (irrigation)Traction (geology)Model predictive controlHarmonic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increasing demand for electrified transportation requires high-power, efficient, and reliable traction drive systems. Dual three-phase permanent magnet machines (DTP-PMSMs) with high saliency ratios offer key advantages for these applications but introduce challenges in control accuracy and current harmonic suppression. This paper proposes a novel finite control set model predictive control (FCS-MPC) strategy with an enhanced sector selection method specifically tailored for high-saliency DTP-PMSM drives. The proposed approach improves actuation accuracy in the <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">d-q</i> subspace by reliably identifying the optimal virtual vectors, while a quasi-proportional resonant (QPR) controller effectively suppresses current harmonics in the <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">x-y</i> subspace. Simulation and experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method achieves a fast dynamic response, reduced current ripple, and strong current harmonic suppression, outperforming existing virtual vector-based FCS-MPC and field-oriented proportional-integral (PI) control methods. The results confirm the robustness and efficacy of the proposed controller across a wide range of operating conditions, making it a promising solution for high-performance electric drives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.931
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Transportation ElectrificationSame topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207