MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Integral-integral affine geometry, geometric quantization, and Riemann–Roch

2025· article· en· W7117478740 on OpenAlexafffund
Mark D. Hamilton, Yael Karshon, Takahiko Yoshida

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geometry and Physics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGeometry and complex manifolds
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMount Allison University
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUnited States-Israel Binational Science Foundation
KeywordsFibrationAffine geometryAffine coordinate systemAffine spaceSymplectic geometryAffine hullAffine transformationSimple (philosophy)Affine combinationAffine plane (incidence geometry)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We give a simple proof that, for a pre-quantized compact symplectic manifold with a Lagrangian torus fibration, its Riemann–Roch number coincides with its number of Bohr–Sommerfeld fibres. This can be viewed as an instance of the “independence of polarization” phenomenon of geometric quantization. The base space for such a fibration acquires a so-called integral-integral affine structure. The proof uses the following simple fact, whose proof is trickier than we expected: on a compact integral-integral affine manifold, the total volume is equal to the number of integer points.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.006
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geometry and PhysicsSame topicGeometry and complex manifoldsFrench-language works237,207