MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Precision Control of Wafer Transfer Robots with Unknown Dynamics: an Output Feedback Approach

2025· article· en· W7117482664 on OpenAlexaff
Yoshiro Fukui, Eiru Doi, Mohammad Al Saaideh, Mohammad Al Janaideh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIterative Learning Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)TrajectoryParametric statisticsObserver (physics)Tracking (education)Controller (irrigation)RobotTracking error

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An output feedback trajectory tracking controller is presented for a belt-driven wafer transfer robot (WTR) with unknown dynamics, achieving precise tracking. The controller employs an extended high-gain observer (EHGO) to effectively estimate the lumped effect of unknown dynamics and disturbances. The robot dynamic model is formulated using the Euler-Lagrange equation, incorporating the belts elongation and contraction, as these factors are the dominant contributors to the tracking error. In contrast, coupling effects, frictional forces, and parametric uncertainties are assumed to be unknown, as they are not the primary determinants of tracking precision and are difficult to measure. This strategic distinction between known and unknown model components contributes to the proposed controller performance. The simulation results illustrate the minimization of the tracking error for the base link.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIterative Learning Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207