MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117486606 · doi:10.55893/jt.vol24no2.749

Rancang Bangun Sistem Penyortiran dan Pemantauan Anak Ayam Sehat dan Tidak Sehat Berdasarkan Bobot dan Suhu menggunakan Platform <i>Internet-of-Things</i>

2025· article· W7117486606 on OpenAlexaff
Zul Fakhri, Dedi Dedi, Kusnandar Kusnandar, Yuda Bakti Zainal, Irvan Budiawan, Asep Najmurrokhman

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Teknik Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Aplikasi Teknik · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicDiverse Cultural Media Analysis
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInformatics engineeringInternet of Things

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kondisi kesehatan anak ayam pada fase awal pemeliharaan berperan penting terhadap produktivitas serta efisiensi usaha peternakan unggas. Penelitian ini bertujuan merancang dan merealisasikan sistem otomatis untuk penyortiran serta pemantauan kesehatan anak ayam berdasarkan bobot badan dan suhu tubuh dengan memanfaatkan teknologi Internet of Things (IoT). Sistem dirancang menggunakan sensor load cell sebagai pengukur bobot, sensor suhu MLX90614, serta mikrokontroler ESP32 sebagai unit pengolah data, dengan indikator keluaran berupa buzzer, LED, dan LCD. Data hasil pengukuran dikirim secara real-time ke platform ThingSpeak untuk keperluan visualisasi dan analisis. Proses klasifikasi dilakukan dengan membandingkan nilai bobot dan suhu terhadap ambang batas standar kesehatan ayam broiler. Anak ayam dikategorikan sehat apabila memiliki bobot 36–40 gram dan suhu tubuh 37–40 °C, sedangkan nilai di luar rentang tersebut menunjukkan kondisi tidak sehat. Hasil pengujian membuktikan bahwa sistem mampu mengklasifikasikan kondisi anak ayam secara tepat dengan tingkat akurasi mencapai 100% serta menyediakan informasi yang dapat diakses melalui perangkat seluler maupun komputer. Sistem ini diharapkan dapat meningkatkan efisiensi pemantauan kesehatan ayam dan mengurangi ketergantungan pada metode manual. Ke depan, pengembangan dapat dilakukan dengan menambahkan algoritma kecerdasan buatan untuk meningkatkan ketelitian klasifikasi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.583
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.004
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0060.002
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Teknik Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Aplikasi TeknikSame topicDiverse Cultural Media AnalysisFrench-language works237,207