MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7117488447 · doi:10.2196/81499

Identifying Undiagnosed High-Risk Suicidality Cases by Matching Patients With a Similar Comorbidity Burden: Retrospective Observational Study

2025· article· en· W7117488447 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Louisa Bode, Rena Xu, Matthew Garber

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Formative Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSuicide and Self-Harm Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComorbidityObservational studyMatching (statistics)Retrospective cohort studyPoison controlMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Suicide is the second leading cause of death for children and adolescents aged 6 to 18 years old. Pediatric suicidality is underreported, which poses significant challenges for effective intervention and prevention strategies. Identifying populations at risk for suicidality can provide critical benefits in terms of study cohort selection, prevalence estimation, and clinical resource allocation. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to (1) measure the prevalence of mental health comorbidities in pediatric suicidality, and (2) identify undiagnosed high-risk suicidality cases by matching patients with similar mental health comorbidity burden. METHODS: Electronic health record data from a large academic pediatric hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, were analyzed for patients aged 6-18 years old presenting to the emergency department between June 1, 2016, and June 1, 2022. Suicidality cases were defined using ICD-10 codes for three suicidality subtypes: suicidal ideation, self-harm, and suicide attempt. Comorbidities of suicidality were calculated as the conditional probability of ICD-10 code pairs. After multiple hypothesis corrections, statistically significant comorbidities and patient encounter demographics were input as covariates into a propensity score matching (PSM) model. Accuracy of the PSM model was validated against chart review by two independent subject matter experts. RESULTS: In total, 2,638 ED encounters met an ICD-10-based case definition of suicidality during the study period. The prevalence of suicidality (2.9%) by subtype was ideation (2.5%), self-harm (1.1%), and attempt (0.2%). Suicidality prevalence was more common for female sex (4.2%) than male sex (1.7%). Comorbidities of suicidality were statistically significant for 55 frequently co-occurring ICD-10 codes. Nearly half of these comorbidities (26/55) were not present in DSM-5, and nearly a quarter (12/55) consisted of ICD-10 codes for accidental rather than intentional self-harm. Increased probability of suicidality was observed for patients with personality disorder (44%), gender dysphoria (43%), bipolar disorder (36%), depression (33%), and schizophrenia spectrum disorders (32%). Based on gold standard chart review, 53.4% of propensity matched non-cases were unrecognized suicidality cases. CONCLUSIONS: Propensity score matching using comorbidity profiles is an effective approach for identifying suicidality cases that lack ICD-10 codes for suicidality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.133
GPT teacher head0.452
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Formative Research→Same topicSuicide and Self-Harm Studies→French-language works237,207→