MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117490114 · doi:10.18860/jia.v8i4.26505

Unveiling the Past: Architectural Characteristics of a Few Islamic Buildings in Prizren

2025· article· W7117490114 on OpenAlex
Sedat KRYEZİU, Qendrim Hoxha

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Islamic Architecture · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchitecture and Cultural Influences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIslamCONQUESTQuarter (Canadian coin)Islamic architectureScope (computer science)Period (music)Islamic culture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The first Islamic buildings in Prizren (Kosovo) are related to the conquest and establishment of the Ottoman administration in Kosovo, which began in the last quarter of the 14th century and ended in 1455. This period marked a turning point in the history of Kosovo's architecture. The Ottomans brought their culture and architectural traditions to a country with Christian traditions. Mosques, public baths (hammams), madrasas, bridges, bazaars, caravanserais, and other structures were built. The paper examines the architectural elements of three Islamic buildings in Prizren, a city with significant historical and cultural heritage. Furthermore, the paper provides insights into its design, construction techniques, and stylistic features. The scope of this paper includes historical context, architectural analyses, and cultural significance. The outcomes presented in this paper demonstrate that the first Islamic buildings in Kosovo embody authentic Ottoman values. The new values were later integrated into the local culture, resulting in the creation of a distinct Oriental style. In addition to the analysis of the synthesis, the comparative method was also employed in the drafting of this paper, drawing on relevant literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.485
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it