Unveiling the Past: Architectural Characteristics of a Few Islamic Buildings in Prizren
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The first Islamic buildings in Prizren (Kosovo) are related to the conquest and establishment of the Ottoman administration in Kosovo, which began in the last quarter of the 14th century and ended in 1455. This period marked a turning point in the history of Kosovo's architecture. The Ottomans brought their culture and architectural traditions to a country with Christian traditions. Mosques, public baths (hammams), madrasas, bridges, bazaars, caravanserais, and other structures were built. The paper examines the architectural elements of three Islamic buildings in Prizren, a city with significant historical and cultural heritage. Furthermore, the paper provides insights into its design, construction techniques, and stylistic features. The scope of this paper includes historical context, architectural analyses, and cultural significance. The outcomes presented in this paper demonstrate that the first Islamic buildings in Kosovo embody authentic Ottoman values. The new values were later integrated into the local culture, resulting in the creation of a distinct Oriental style. In addition to the analysis of the synthesis, the comparative method was also employed in the drafting of this paper, drawing on relevant literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".