MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117530305 · doi:10.24235/equalita.v7i2.18651

Analisis Peran Gender dalam Acara Clash Of Champions Ruangguru: Perspektif Kesetaraan dan Partisipasi dalam Meraih Prestasi

2025· article· W7117530305 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Titi Murni Asih, Nur Ismiati, Asna Lutfa

Bibliographic record

VenueEqualita Jurnal Studi Gender dan Anak · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender and Women's Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeaning (existential)Qualitative researchQuarter (Canadian coin)Representation (politics)Femininity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRAK: Permasalahan kesetaraan gender di Indonesia masih terus diperjuangkan hingga saat ini agar perempuan mendapatkan hak yang setara dengan laki-laki dalam berbagai hal, seperti pendidikan, pekerjaan, dan hak-hak lainnya. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis terkait kesetaraan gender pada video Clash of Champions yang diselenggarakan oleh Ruangguru. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif deskriptif yang menggunakan tiga teknik yaitu analisis konten, studi pustaka, dan menitik beratkan pada tinjauan semiotika dengan model Charles Sanders Pierce yang terdiri dari: tanda, objek, dan interpretasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa melalui aplikasi Ruangguru, siapa saja bisa mendapatkan kesempatan belajar untuk bisa masuk pada perguruan tinggi tanpa memandang jenis kelamin. Dalam hal ini juga membuktikan, bahwa perempuan memiliki kesetaraan dalam bersaing untuk meraih prestasi dan kesuksesan. Tentunya, dalam tayangan episode pertama Clash of Champions peserta secara setara bersaing secara sehat untuk mencapai prestasi dalam hal pendidikan. Kata Kunci: Kesetaraan Gender, Ruang Guru, Semiotika, Kompetisi ABSTRACT: The issue of gender equality in Indonesia continues to be fought for to this day, ensuring that women have equal rights with men in various matters, such as education, employment, and other rights. The aim of this research is to analyze gender equality in the Clash of Champions video organized by Ruangguru. This research uses a descriptive qualitative method that employs three techniques: content analysis, literature study, and a focus on semiotic review using the Charles Sanders Pierce model, which consists of: signs, objects, and interpretation. The research results show that through the Ruangguru application, anyone can get the opportunity to learn to enter higher education regardless of gender. In this case it proves that women have equality in competing to achieve achievement and success, in first episode broadcast of Clash of Champions, participants compete equally in a fair manner to achieve educational achievement. Keywords: Gender Equality, Teacher Room, Semiotics, Competition

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.371
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEqualita Jurnal Studi Gender dan AnakSame topicGender and Women's RightsFrench-language works237,207