MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117531715 · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.5c03118

Modeling CO <sub>2</sub> and H <sub>2</sub> O Co-desorption in an Internal Joule Heating-Assisted Vacuum-Structured Packed Bed DAC Contactor

2025· article· en· W7117531715 on OpenAlexafffund
Ion Iliuta, Faı̈çal Larachi

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCarbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPacked bedDesorptionZeoliteContactorEnergy consumptionAir separationProcess (computing)Mass transfer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Direct air capture (DAC) technologies offer a promising avenue for mitigating climate change by removing CO 2 from the atmosphere. Innovations in energy-efficient DAC technologies are essential to increase their deployment and reduce costs, making them a more viable and accessible solution for carbon removal. Currently, DAC is an energy-intensive process, and reducing its energy consumption is vital for cost-effectiveness. This research focuses on enhancing the DAC process, specifically the regeneration phase, by utilizing structured packed beds coated with zeolite 13X. The goal is to achieve faster and more energy-efficient desorption of CO 2 and H 2 O. We investigated the dynamic behavior of the co-desorption of CO 2 and H 2 O during the solid-based DAC process that uses structured packed beds coated with zeolite 13X and heated by internal Joule heating via a two-dimensional unsteady-state, nonisothermal, two-scale heterogeneous model. The study examines how the magnitude and time evolution of the volumetric energy source heating the packed bed, along with CO 2 and H 2 O uptake, coated zeolite layer thickness, and packed bed height affect the desorption process and energy consumption in DAC units, specifically comparing structured and random packing configurations. The results indicate that under similar starting regeneration conditions (same total mass of CO 2 and H 2 O adsorbed in the unit, quantified in kilograms), the specific energy requirements associated with the CO 2 desorption process are lower in a DAC unit with structured packing than in a unit with random-packing spherical zeolite particles. On the other side, at the same starting CO 2 and H 2 O uptakes (quantified in mol/kg) and high CO 2 uptake levels (>2.0 mol/kg), structured packing and packed beds with spherical particles exhibit similar specific energy requirements for CO 2 and combined CO 2 and H 2 O desorption processes. In DAC systems, using structured packing instead of randomly packed units for CO 2 and H 2 O desorption can significantly reduce the duration of the desorption process and improve the H 2 O desorption efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchSame topicCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207