Comment l’authenticité critique peut-elle nous protéger contre les manipulations des discours idéologiques?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mobilisée par Hume et Hegel, avant d’être reprise par Honneth, l’éthicité démocratique vise à jeter les bases éthiques d’un langage social commun. Elle recoupe le concept rawlsien d’équilibre réfléchi, qui nous invite à accueillir tout point de vue qui pourrait bonifier ceux sur lesquels nous prenons appui, et la notion d’éthanalyse, qui nous convie au développement d’une épistémologie du sens commun qui favorise la construction de représentations sociales partagées, permettant l’émergence d’une perspective critique dialogique. C’est à partir de ce cadre que nous mobiliserons différentes interprétations du concept de représentation sociale pour établir les fondements d’une réelle authenticité critique visant à nous prémunir contre les discours idéologiques et la manipulation des connaissances et de l’information.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".