MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117534739 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2025.3649673

Empowering IIoT With Federated Edge Learning for Human Activity Recognition Problems

2025· article· W7117534739 on OpenAlexaff
Dang Nhat Minh, Abdellah Chehri, Dang Van Anh, Van-Hau Nguyen, Nguyễn Minh Quý, Dinh C. Nguyen, Vũ Khánh Quý, Gwanggil Jeon

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
FundersKorea University of Technology and Education
KeywordsActivity recognitionCloud computingSoftware deploymentUploadEdge computingEdge deviceEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionData modeling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human Activity Recognition (HAR) has become a cornerstone in the dynamic development of the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT). This study introduces an extensive framework aimed at embedding HAR functionality into industrial settings to promote workplace safety, streamline operations, and facilitate predictive maintenance. Through AI techniques, HAR problems can be achieved with high accuracy. However, traditional AI models require centrally trained data on remotely powerful cloud servers. This leads to issues with privacy and security of health records and increases latency. To address this problem, the Federated Learning (FL) technique was proposed. FL allows distributed training on the patient’s IoT devices and serves as the communication mechanism between local devices and the FL aggregator. Thanks to this architecture, the health data needs only to be stored locally on its devices without being uploaded to data centers, thus ensuring security and reducing service response times and computational costs. In this study, we implement FedANN and FedConvNN independently in a federated learning setting to address human activity recognition problems toward real-time applications. Finally, we evaluate the effectiveness of the based on the variation initiation of the number of different training clients. The results show that the FedConvNN solution improves accuracy and reduces model and communication complexity compared to FedANN and centralized training models, with the potential for real-time deployment in HAR tasks. Our code is available on our GitHub repository: https://github.com/itsminhcs/Fedavg-HAR.git.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.799
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsFrench-language works237,207