Liberté de la presse et liberté académique au péril de la concentration médiatique et à la marchandisation du savoir
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La concentration médiatique entre les mains d’une poignée d’oligarques nationaux ainsi que la marchandisation du savoir induite par la concurrence instaurée entre les universités ont mené depuis le début du XXIe siècle, au Québec comme ailleurs en Occident, au déclin de la liberté de la presse et de la liberté académique, pourtant garantes d’une opinion publique éclairée et de prises de décision collectives fondées sur des connaissances soumises à l’épreuve des faits. En réponse à l’idéologie néolibérale qui sévit, le militantisme de journalistes et d’universitaires conduit à une impasse, puisqu’il contribue également à dévoyer leurs fonctions. S’il faut renouer avec l’enquête méthodique et la recherche honnête de la vérité, la tâche est ardue dans le régime publicitaire mis en place, qui se caractérise davantage par la manipulation et le mensonge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.023 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.021 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".