MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7117548817 · doi:10.47836/pp.1.6.016

Optimizing Cognitive Assessment: Key Variable Identification for Efficiency Using Ensemble Learning

2025· article· W7117548817 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Salami Safran Olugbenga, Fakhrul Zaman Rokhani, Halimatus Sakdiah Minhat, Siti Anom Ahmad, Syamsiah Mashohor, Helen Zhao, Pin Tan Maw

Bibliographic record

VenuePertanika Proceedings · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRandom forestEnsemble learningKey (lock)Boosting (machine learning)Gradient boostingCognitionIdentification (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) signifies an abnormal cognitive decline that surpasses the natural deterioration associated with aging. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a leading tool for MCI detection, evaluating twelve variables to diagnose various cognitive domains. This study aims to optimize the MoCA by identifying the most critical variables, thus simplifying the test while maintaining diagnostic accuracy. Using an Ensemble model comprising Gradient Boosting and Random Forest techniques, eight key variables were identified, enhancing the MoCA’s efficiency without compromising its effectiveness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePertanika Proceedings→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→