MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117550859 · doi:10.17268/jamm.2025.006

Optimización de tiempos para reducir costos en carguío y acarreo mediante un modelo de Red Neuronal Artificial

2025· article· W7117550859 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fabricio Ruiz Santos

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advanced Mining Modeling · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicMining Techniques and Economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrder (exchange)Work (physics)Unit (ring theory)Balance (ability)Function (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La investigación tuvo como objetivo reducir los costos mediante el control de tiempos y la mejora del mantenimiento de la ruta de acarreo. Se empleó un enfoque cuantitativo y un diseño cuasi experimental, realizando una evaluación de los procesos existentes de carguío y transporte, considerando la distancia recorrida, los equipos utilizados y los tiempos involucrados. Durante 20 guardias se monitorearon las operaciones y se implementaron controles de tiempos de carguío y acarreo, así como la programación de una red neuronal para predecir los costos asociados. Los resultados obtenidos muestran que, al verificar los tiempos y las predicciones con los promedios, existe una diferencia de $0.20 por tonelada métrica. Asimismo, al revisar los tiempos de transporte y el adecuado mantenimiento de la ruta de acarreo, los costos de soporte se redujeron de $1.04 por tonelada métrica a $0.90, logrando un ahorro adicional de $0.14. Además, se concluyó que el control del tiempo y el mantenimiento adecuado de la vía permiten reducir los tiempos de carguío en un 11.45% y los tiempos de transporte en un 12.73% dentro de la unidad minera. Se propone un modelo predictivo para próximas investigaciones basado en redes neuronales que permite optimizar los tiempos de carguío y acarreo, logrando una reducción de hasta 0.34 USD/TM en los costos operativos. Referencias [1] Anticona, J.Y.; Noriega, E.M.; Cotrina, M.A.; Arango, M.S.M. (2024). Evaluation of Predictive Models for the Optimization of the Cost of Unit Operations in Artisanal Underground Mining. Mathematical Modelling of Engineering Problems, 11(4), 2901–2911.DOI: https://doi.org/10.18280/mmep.111103 [2] Baek, J.; Choi, Y. (2017). A New Method for Haul Road Design in Open-Pit Mines to Support Efficient Truck Haulage Operations. Applied Sciences, 7(7), 747.DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app7070747 [3] Baek, J.; Choi, Y. (2020). Deep neural network for predicting ore production by truck-haulage systems in open-pit mines. Applied Sciences, 10(5), 1657.DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app10051657 [4] Baunier de Melo, W. (2021). Optimization of truck allocation in mines using differential evolution algorithm. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 9(8), 338–350.DOI: https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol9.iss8.3303 [5] Cotrina, MA; Araujo, J.J.; Mamani, J.N. et al. (2025). Estimación de recursos minerales mediante cópulas espaciales y aprendizaje automático optimizado con metaheurísticas en un yacimiento de cobre. Earth Sci Inform, 18, 514.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-025-02009-2 [6] Cotrina, MA; Marquina, JJ; Riquelme, Á.I. (2025). Comparación de técnicas de aprendizaje automático para la categorización de recursos minerales en un yacimiento de cobre en Perú. Nat Resour Res, 34, 2007–2025.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-025-10505-x [7] Cotrina, M.A.; Marquina, J.J. (2025). Hybrid Machine Learning Models for Mineral Resource Classification in a Copper Deposit in Peru. Math Geosci.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-025-10247-9 [8] Cotrina, M.; Marquina, J.; Polo, J. (2025). Prediction of unit haulage cost in an underground mine using machine learning techniques. Journal of Sustainable Mining, 24(2), Article 9.DOI: https://doi.org/10.46873/2300-3960.1454 [9] Cotrina, MA; Marquina, JJ; Mamani, J.N. (2025). Application of artificial neural networks for the categorization of mineral resources in a copper deposit in Peru. World Journal of Engineering, ahead-of-print.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/WJE-01-2025-0004 [10] Cotrina, M.A.; Vera, J.K.; Arango, S.M. (2025). An Intelligent Approach to Predicting Dilution, Overbreak and Costs in Underground Mining Using Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks. Mathematical Modelling of Engineering Problems, 12(3), 815–828.DOI: https://doi.org/10.18280/mmep.120308 [11] Cotrina, M.; Marquina, J.; Mamani, J.; Arango, S.; Gonzalez, J.; Noriega, E.; Antonio, E. (2025). Hybrid machine learning techniques to predict fuel consumption of dump trucks in an open-pit mine in Peru. International Journal of Mining and Mineral Engineering, 1–20.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMME.2025.145583 [12] Enkhchuluun, B.; Batgerel, B.-O.; Ping, C. (2023). Cycle Time Analysis Mining Dump Trucks. International Journal of Geosciences, 14, 689–709.DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2023.148037 [13] Gu, Q.; Lu, C.; Li, F.; Wan, C. (2008). Monitoring Dispatch Information System of Trucks and Shovels in an Open Pit Based on GIS/GPS/GPRS. Journal of China University of Mining and Technology, 18(2), 288–292.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1006-1266(08)60061-9 [14] Huayanca, D.; et al. (2023). Application of Discrete-Event Simulation for Truck Fleet Management in Mining. Applied Sciences, 13(7).DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13074093 [15] Icarte, G.; Riveros Araya, E.; Herzog, O. (2020). An Agent-based System for Truck Dispatching in Open-pit Mines. ICAART 2020.DOI: https://doi.org/10.5220/0008961800730081 [16] Karikari, Y.S.; Askari Nasab, H. (2024). A Comprehensive Simulation Model for Mining Operations: Development, Implementation, and Validation Using HaulSim. Technical Report, University of Alberta.DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33986.08649 [17] Kecojevic, V.; Komljenovic, D. (2005). Haul truck cycle-time prediction in open-pit mines using artificial neural networks. International Journal of Surface Mining, Reclamation and Environment, 19(1), 1–17.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13895260500032564 [18] Krause, A.; Musingwini, C. (2019). Estimating truck-shovel fleet productivity using discrete-event simulation. International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment, 33(5), 299–313.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17480930.2018.1438522 [19] Mandal, S.K.; Dey, S.; Bhar, C. (2018). Analysis of Factors Which Influence the Cycle Time of Dumpers of Open Cast Coal Mines to Improve Production. Modelling, Measurement and Control C, 78(3), 289–302.DOI: https://doi.org/10.18280/mmc_c.780303 [20] Meneses, D.; Sepúlveda, F.D. (2023). Modeling Productivity Reduction and Fuel Consumption in Open-Pit Mining Trucks Considering Road Deterioration. Mining, 3(1), 96–105.DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/mining3010006 [21] Mnzool, M.; Almujibah, H.; Bakri, M.; Gaafar, A.; Elhassan, A.A.M.; Gomaa, E. (2024). Optimization of cycle time for loading and hauling trucks in open-pit mining. Mining of Mineral Deposits, 18(1), 18–26.DOI: https://doi.org/10.33271/mining18.01.018 [22] Pathan, S.M.; et al. (2025). Simulation Optimization of Shovel-Truck System in Open-Pit Mines. Applied Technology & Research, 2025.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/atr/7939037 [23] Shah, K.S.; Rehman, S.U. (2020). Modeling and Optimization of Truck–Shovel Allocation to Mining Faces in Cement Quarry. Journal of Mining and Environment, 11(1), 21–30.DOI: https://doi.org/10.22044/jme.2019.8329.1712 [24] Shakenov, A.; Sładkowski, A.; Stolpovskikh, I. (2022). Haul Road Condition Impact on Tire Life of Mining Dump Truck. Mining Journal (NVNGU), 2022(6), Art. 025.DOI: https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2022-6/025 [25] Simon, V.; Pellerin, R.; Gamache, M. (2025). Predicting Haul Truck Travel Times in Underground Mines. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 42(4), 1989–2009.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-025-01293-2 [26] Soofastaei, A.; Aminossadati, S.; Kizil, M.S.; Knights, P. (2015). The Effect of Rolling Resistance on Fuel Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Haul Trucks in Surface Mines. Tribology International, 92, 222–234.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2015.06.007 [27] Wang, X.; Dai, Q.; Bian, Y.; Zhang, M. (2023). Real-time truck dispatching in open-pit mines. International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment, 37(6), 400–420.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17480930.2023.2201120 [28] Wang, X.; Dai, Q.; Bian, Y.; Xie, G. (2023). Real-time truck dispatching in open-pit mines. International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment, 37(7), 1–20.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17480930.2023.2201120 [29] Zhang, Y.; et Eal. (2022). Determination of Truck–Shovel Configuration of Open-Pit Mines using Simulation and Mathematical Modelling. Sustainability, 14(19), 12338.DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912338

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.140
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Advanced Mining ModelingSame topicMining Techniques and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207