MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117552536 · doi:10.5539/hes.v16n1p136

Trauma-Informed Framework for Teacher Professional Development Through Simulation

2025· article· W7117552536 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Daniel Nikritin

Bibliographic record

VenueHigher Education Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPeace and Human Rights Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitive reframingDebriefingFocus groupProfessional developmentInterpersonal communicationFaculty developmentTransformative learningCredibilityCurriculumPsychological resilienceInterpersonal relationship

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Simulation-Based Learning (SBL) is an established, high-impact method for teacher professional development, traditionally focused on improving conflict management and interpersonal skills. However, following a severe regional security crisis and mass evacuation, educators face a "double burden" of personal distress alongside the systemic expectation to provide emotional stability for students. This challenge is intensified when teachers share the same community affiliation and displacement experience as their students. This study investigates the necessary trauma-informed adaptations of the SBL model when utilized for elementary school teachers from these impacted communities. Methodology: This qualitative, interpretive study analyzed evidence gathered from 38 simulation workshops conducted for educational teams post-crisis. Data included analysis of correspondence, reflective discourse, and participant feedback, aimed at uncovering subjective meanings and contextual adjustments. Findings and Conclusions: The findings reveal a profound, trauma-informed adaptation of the core pedagogical model. Three critical shifts were identified to mitigate re-traumatization and foster resilience: Safety and Choice in Design: There was an explicit shift from seeking maximum fidelity (realism) to prioritizing psychological safety. This was achieved through utilizing "lean" or "loose" scenarios that grant participants Choice and Control, directly reinforcing the core Trauma-Informed Care (TIC) principle. Reframing the Learning Goal: The focus shifted from external, confrontational interpersonal skills to self-centered skills such as self-regulation and efficacy, to avoid triggering pathological automatisms. Group Holding: The debriefing stage embraced "group holding" and a protective atmosphere, facilitated by homogeneous group compositions that allowed for mutual support and the externalization of blame onto systemic factors. This study proposes a Trauma-Informed Simulation Framework, underscoring that in post-crisis contexts, the pedagogical objective must transition from "skill acquisition" to "resilience building" and "group cohesion," while significantly reducing the "stretch zone" for productive challenge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.609
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.156
GPT teacher head0.509
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHigher Education StudiesSame topicPeace and Human Rights EducationFrench-language works237,207