PUBLIC GOVERNANCE IN THE FIELD OF GEOLOGICAL EXPLORATION: INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE AND PROSPECTS FOR KAZAKHSTAN
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article examines the mechanisms of public governance and financing of geological exploration through the lens of international experience and their applicability in Kazakhstan. Particular attention is paid to the issues of transparency, efficiency in the use of public resources, and the need to establish sustainable institutions for subsoil use regulation. It is demonstrated that government involvement in geological exploration should be aimed at creating information and legal infrastructure, reducing entrepreneurial risks, and establishing favorable conditions for attracting private capital. Based on the analysis of practices in Canada, Australia, Chile, the USA, the EU, and China, recommendations are formulated to improve the system of public governance in geological exploration, including the audit of state programs, the implementation of digital services, and the development of public-private partnership mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it