MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Novel Architecture for Distributed Computer Vision in IoT Embedded Systems

2025· article· W7117554773 on OpenAlexaff
Yvon R. W. Mougang, Rodolfo W. L. Coutinho

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNova
KeywordsBlock (permutation group theory)Frame (networking)Cloud computingAnalyticsArchitectureProcess (computing)Mobile deviceEdge computingSystems architecture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Computer vision is becoming a building block in many intelligent systems. Accordingly, video frames are timely analyzed, and computationally generated information can be overlaid on users’ visual perception of the physical world to augment their experiences or produce commands to control autonomous mobile robots. Traditionally, computer vision is performed at cloud and edge servers, where deep learning models are deployed to process video frames. However, accelerators for embedded devices have been proposed, and video frame inference at embedded devices might reduce latency, overhead, and costs in computer vision-based systems. This paper proposes a novel architecture to enable distributed and collaborative vision analytics in networked embedded devices. The proposed architecture encompasses the different building blocks to enable video frame offloading among the network-embedded devices, video frame inference, and devices’ telemetry for data collection. A preliminary analysis of the proposed architecture is conducted, and its potential for enabling distributed video analytics at networked embedded devices is highlighted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207