CROSS-CULTURAL EMOTION ANALYSIS ON X USING BIDIRECTIONAL ENCODER REPRESENTATIONS FROM TRANSFORMERS (BERT)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is essential to understand how environmental factors and cultural backgrounds affect emotional responses to build Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) technologies. This study uses the BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) model to investigate the emotional landscape of interactions on the X platform across various cultural contexts. The aims of the study are as follows: (1) Gather and prepare X platform data from COVID-19 sources in India, Pakistan, Malaysia, the US, the UK, Australia, and Canada. (2) Use a BERT model to qualitatively analyze tweet sentiment. (3) Assess the accuracy of the model and look for sentiment trends in tweets from nations throughout the pandemic. The BERT model successfully classified sentiment, as seen by its 80.29% accuracy rate on test data. Sentiment research showed that positive sentiment was far more prevalent in the US, Canada, and Australia, indicating that these countries were better able to adjust to the COVID-19 situation. Stability was seen in the balanced sentiment distributions displayed by Pakistan, India, and the United Kingdom. Despite having fewer data points, Pakistan and Malaysia continued to have largely positive attitudes. This study provides the basis for a comparative analysis of emotional responses by taking contextual and cultural aspects into account.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".