MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Liposomal Delivery of Pyronaridine as a Repurposed Inhibitor of ERCC1/XPF for the Sensitization of Colorectal Cancer Cells to Platinum Chemotherapeutics

2025· article· en· W7117576164 on OpenAlexafffund
Parnian Mehinrad, Ahmed Abdelfattah, Tanin Shafaati, Jaber Emami, James Donnelly, F. G. West, Michael Weinfeld, Afsaneh Lavasanifar

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Pharmaceutics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlberta Cancer Foundation
KeywordsOxaliplatinLiposomeCarboplatinSensitizationMTT assayCytotoxicityCancer cellColorectal cancerCytotoxic T cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Inhibition of ERCC1/XPF, a heterodimeric enzyme complex with endonuclease activity that participates in the repair of DNA inter- and intrastrand cross-links, is expected to make cells sensitive to DNA damage by platinum-based chemotherapeutics. Here we report on repurposing a clinically used antimalaria drug, pyronaridine (PYD), as a novel inhibitor of ERCC1/XPF for the sensitization of colorectal cancer cells (CRC) to platinum drugs. We have developed a liposomal formulation of PYD to make the chemosensitizing activity of this ERCC1/XPF inhibitor more specific to the tumor site. Liposomal PYD was optimized by changing the lipid composition and the pH gradient system within the liposomes. Prepared formulations were characterized for their average diameter, PYD encapsulation, and in vitro drug release. The intracellular XPF–PYD interaction and subsequent XPF protein thermal stabilization in intact HCT116 cells were confirmed by the cellular thermal shift assay (CETSA). The cytotoxic activity of free and selected PYD liposomal formulation alone or in combination with carboplatin and oxaliplatin was assessed against HCT116 and SW620 cells using MTT and colony-forming assays. The possibility of a synergistic effect between PYD or liposomal PYD and Pt-based chemotherapeutics in HCT116 was tested through analyzing the MTT assays using the Combenefit software. The results showed an average diameter of 82.32 ± 0.33 nm with a polydispersity index of 0.181 ± 0.008 along with a 99% PYD encapsulation efficiency for the optimized liposomal formulations prepared using a combination of 1,2-distearoyl- sn -glycero-3-phosphocholine (DSPC), 1,2-distearoyl- sn -glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine- N -[methoxy(polyethylene glycol)-2000] (DSPE-PEG), and cholesterol with an inside pH of 3.5. In media consisting of PBS and bovine serum albumin, ∼50% of the loaded PYD was released within 72 h. The validation of target interaction performed via CETSA in vitro demonstrated the significant thermal stabilization of XPF after treatment with either free or liposomal PYD at the temperature range of 47–50 °C. Combenefit analysis showed synergy in HCT116 cells between PYD and carboplatin, which was further increased when carboplatin was combined with liposomal PYD. Oxaliplatin and PYD combination displayed less synergy in HCT116 cells, while combining oxaliplatin and liposomal PYD only showed an additive effect in this cell line. In SW620 cells, an elevated level of PYD was needed (0.6 μM) for the sensitization of cells to the effect of carboplatin or oxaliplatin. The colony-forming assay in HCT116 cells evidenced a decrease of colony formation when PYD (0.15 μM) was combined with carboplatin or oxaliplatin. In SW620, a higher PYD concentration (0.6 μM) was required to significantly lower colony formation when paired with carboplatin, suggesting lower sensitivity compared to HCT116 cells. The same trend was seen with the oxaliplatin combination. The results indicate a potential for PYD and its liposomal formulation in the chemosensitization of CRC to platinum chemotherapeutics in a cell-dependent manner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.630

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular PharmaceuticsSame topicNanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryFrench-language works237,207