MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117583389 · doi:10.1061/jmcee7.mteng-21818

Nano-Modified Coatings for Concrete Protection against Magnesium Sulfate

2025· article· en· W7117583389 on OpenAlexaff
L. M. Ariyadasa, M. T. Bassuoni, J. Carroll, Ahmed Ghazy

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicConcrete and Cement Materials Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WinnipegUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnesiumCementitiousCarbonationSulfateDurabilityCementEfflorescenceCalcium hydroxideCalcium carbonateRetarder

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Concrete structures exposed to sulfate-rich environments in coastal regions are susceptible to durability issues caused by magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) attack. The existing guidelines/codes recommendations are to use sulfate-resistant cement with/without supplementary cementitious materials and a low water-to-binder ratio (w/b). In general, this strategy is highly effective at protecting concrete from sodium sulfate attack. However, any cementitious matrix containing calcium-silicate-hydrate and calcium hydroxide remains vulnerable to decomposition by magnesium sulfate, highlighting the need for additional protective measures. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of nano-modified coatings in protecting concrete from magnesium sulfate attack. Silane, functioning as a pore liner and waterproofing agent, and vinyl ester, serving as a membrane coating, were utilized as dispersing media for nanoparticles (nano-clay and nano-calcium carbonate at 0, 2.5, and 5% by mass) to develop nano-modified coatings. A colloidal nano-silica solution was also examined as another coating. They were applied to high-quality (w/b=0.4) and low-quality (w/b=0.6) concrete surfaces, which were then exposed to a 10% magnesium sulfate solution under full immersion and combined with cyclic exposures of wet-dry and freeze-thaw conditions. Besides the initial fluid transport properties, the performance of the coated concrete was evaluated by monitoring mass change, modulus of elasticity, and length change of concrete prisms, and the trends were elucidated by thermal, mineralogical, and microscopy analyses. The colloidal silica treatment resisted the initial fluid penetration but was inadequate to protect concrete against magnesium sulfate exposure. Silane/nanocomposites enhanced the performance of concrete under such exposures due to the hydrophobicity of silane, along with the barrier/filling/chemical effects imparted by nanoparticles. Vinyl ester and its nanocomposites exhibited superior performance, which was attributed to the polymeric membrane’s strong bonding and chemical resistance, further enhanced by nanoparticles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.765

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Materials in Civil EngineeringSame topicConcrete and Cement Materials ResearchFrench-language works237,207