Entre a preservação e o acesso o conhecimento mediado a partir das coleções pessoais
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The research discusses personal collections integrated into universities as documentary heritage, highlighting their value for research, institutional memory, and scientific production. These collections reflect the intellectual choices of researchers and professors, as well as the social, cultural, and political contexts of their trajectories, functioning as material testimonies of knowledge. When made available in academic institutions, they offer unique perspectives on reading practices, socialnetworks, and the circulation of ideas and knowledge. The empirical study focuses on the Bibliothèque des livres rares et collections spéciales atthe Université de Montréal, recognized for its strategies in preserving and providing access to bibliographic heritage. The research involved direct observation, document analysis, and interviews with librarians, revealing how the institution addresses contemporary challenges of preservation and access for both the academic public and society. The findings provide guidance for improving the management of personal and special collections in the university context.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.033 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.015 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it