MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Energy-Efficient Distributed Algorithms for Wireless Multimedia Sensor Network Lifetime Extension

2025· article· W7117586042 on OpenAlexaff
Nesrine Khernane, Ahmed Mostefaouie, Azzedine Boukerche, Mohammed Amine Merzoug

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWireless sensor networkEnergy consumptionCoding (social sciences)Reliability (semiconductor)WirelessLinear network codingKey (lock)Wireless networkRouting protocol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks (WMSNs), maximizing network lifetime is a critical challenge due to the high energy demands of video processing and communication. Key factors influencing energy consumption include source coding parameters, the reliability and capacity of communication links, and routing strategies. Since the size of compressed multimedia data—particularly video—is inversely related to its visual quality, a trade-off naturally emerges between data volume and user-perceived quality. This paper addresses the problem of determining optimal coding and routing parameters that extend the network’s operational lifespan while maintaining the required visual quality at the sink and adapting to the dynamic nature of wireless links (e.g., fluctuating capacity and reliability). We propose a fully distributed and adaptive solution tailored to WMSNs. Our approach dynamically adjusts link utilization based on real-time reliability assessments and the residual energy of intermediate nodes. This ensures energy-efficient routing under both stable and perturbed network conditions. Extensive simulations demonstrate that our solution can prolong network lifetime by up to 9.76 times in ideal conditions and by approximately 5 times in the presence of network perturbations, while incurring only 0.16% of total battery energy as overhead. Moreover, the approach is shown to be highly responsive to topology changes, confirming its suitability for real-world WMSN deployments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207