MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

DEM modelling of crop residue and soil dynamics as affected by the tillage direction of a disc harrow

2025· article· en· W7117586145 on OpenAlexafffund
Peng Wu, Xirui Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueBiosystems Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsTillageHarrowLoamCrop residueConventional tillageMulch-tillSoil waterSimulation modeling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A comprehensive understanding of crop residue and soil dynamics under tillage is essential for improving the operational efficiency of tillage implements. In this study, a tandem disc harrow and its interaction with wheat-residue in a sandy loam soil were modelled using the discrete element method. The model was able to simulate two tillage directions: perpendicular and parallel to standing wheat-stubble rows (Perp-Direction and Para-Direction). The model was validated using field measured data. Field experiments showed that Perp-Direction produced significantly lower residue cover than Para-Direction (P < 0.05). Both tillage directions resulted in similar stubble forward displacements (mean: 354 mm). The DEM model predicted these variables with an overall relative error of 19.7 %. Simulations further revealed that stubble trajectories and soil cutting forces varied among individual discs due to the tandem configuration of the harrow. These variables were also influenced by operational parameters: disc angle, harrow travelling speed, and working depth. Reducing these operational parameters decreased soil surface roughness in both tillage directions. Conversely, increasing these operational parameters required higher total draft forces and disturbed a larger soil area. However, the soil cutting efficiency, a performance index combining both total draft force and soil disturbance area, declined from 95.9 to 37.3 m 3 MJ −1 under these conditions. Overall, these findings provide useful guidance for optimising tillage direction and operational parameters of tandem disc harrows to enhance field performance. • A DEM model of a tandem disc harrow was developed and validated with field data. • The model simulated soil and wheat stubble under two tillage directions (TD). • TD affected residue cover but minimally influenced stubble displacement. • Larger disc angle, working speed and depth reduced soil cutting efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiosystems EngineeringSame topicSoil Mechanics and Vehicle DynamicsFrench-language works237,207